One moment please... this post needs to be amended. The police witness in the Kevin Leclair murder trial is different than the police witness in the Jonathan Bacon murder trial but my point remains the same. The former Kelowna gang associates mentioned in th article was in no way whatsoever involved with the shooting of Larry amero and James Riach. He was their friend and did not set them up. To imply otherwise is simply dishonest.
Kim Bolan is attending the murder trial of Jonathan Bacon. As we previously reported, the credibility of the police informant in that case is non existent. Every word that comes out of that loser's mouth is a lie. The witness admitted to lying to the police on a regular basis even after he started working for the police. The witness told the court that he would regularly post false information on Kim Bolan's blog to throw the police off just like a troll involved in the Britney Irving murder we all know and hate. There are many things about that case that just dont make sense.
The latest inconsistency is a distorted report about a former Kelowna gang associate the crown has made. We know that the crown bends over backwards to protect the identity of police informants. The court saw a video of the former gang associate inside the Delta Grand near the front entrance. In opening remarks the crown claims the former associate who has since left the life and got a real job, unlike the tainted police informant, told an associate of the accused that Amero and Riach were in Kelowna that weekend. OK so what does that really mean?
The fact that Larry Amero and Jonathon Bacon were in Kelowna that weekend was no secret. It was their coming out party. They were running around loud and proud on that stupid boat "Steroids and Silicone" trying to pick a fight in public broadcasting the Hells Angels support of the Bacon Brothers. That is why Spike's neice was tragically present. Larry wasn't acting against the clubs wishes he was supporting them. That is why they gave him two huge operations in Montreal after he was shot alongside Jonathan. If the Hells Angels put a contract on Larry, they would not have protected him in Montreal and have hm more work.
If the former gang associate was in on the conspiracy to murder Jonathan Bacon, he would not have been standing outside the hotel durirng the shooting. When people start busting caps sh*t be cray and people run for cover. Although Jonathan Bacon did not trust the former gang associate the former gang associate knew and liked Larry Amero. He did not betray that friendship. Although everyone hated Jonathan Bacon, that gang associate would never have put Larry at risk because he was his friend. This forces us to question the tainted testimony.
Why would the crown put the life of a former gang associate at risk who is clearly not involved in the case and why would a credible news reporter put his life at risk by running with that tainted testimony? It smells suspicious. The crown's evidence is that the former Kelowna gang associate who was a personal friend of Larry Amero and did have UN contacts told a friend that Larry and James Riach was in town. Big deal. That was no secret. Everyone else knew it.
I know exactly what happened. The former gang associate was friends with Larry Amero and went to meet with them at the Grand. This was known years ago. Jonathan saw the former associate and because the former associate had friends who were UN, Jonathan texted Larry and asked Larry to tell his friend to leave so he did. That's it. The former associate was not involved in the plot to kill Jonathan Bacon and shoot Larry Amero. That is a bold faced lie which is not surprising since every word that comes out of that police informant's mouth is a lie.
Why would the loser police informant lie about the former gang associate? Because the former gang associate left the life and got a real job while he didn't. The police informant was too busy bragging about the murder of Brittney Irving and throwing rocks through the windows of one of his ex's that he assaulted in a domestic violence K file. The police witness has beef with the former gang member because the former gang member thinks he is an idiot just like everyone else does. The former gang member stated the police witness was a lost cause. He's still repping the IS and selling drugs long after everyone else had left the life. That is the real motive for the false accusation from the compulsive liar and crystal meth dealer.
If the former gang associate was involved in the conspiracy to shoot Larry Amero and James Riach, why would the former gang associate store Larry's boat and truck at his house after the shooting and why would he give James Riach a ride home to Vancouver from Kelowna afterwards? Because he was not involved and the police informant is lying again.
Canada - GO/DW.
Comments
Post a Comment