Keith Fraser is reporting that "A former RCMP officer who was at the centre of a corruption case involving the Surrey Six murder investigation pleaded guilty to several offences Friday but managed to avoid jail time. Derek Brassington pleaded guilty to breach of trust and attempted obstruction of justice and received a conditional sentence of two years less a day to be served in the community. Because of a publication ban, the reasons for the sentence imposed by B.C. Supreme Court Justice Arne Silverman cannot be reported yet."
"The ban extended as well to submissions made by special prosecutor Chris Considine and defence lawyer Ian Donaldson and evidence heard at the court proceeding in a Vancouver courtroom. The conditions in Brassington’s sentence include house arrest, 100 hours of community service and a $10,000 restitution order. The pleas of Brassington, one of four Mounties charged in the case, bring to an end a key chapter in an investigation that stretches back nearly eight years." Oh but does it? Is this chapter really closed?
The publication ban expires after the trial ends. The delays caused by the RCMP cover up of this case set Jamie Bacon free for participating in and orchestrating the Surrey Six where two innocent bystanders were executed. That chapter is not over yet.
This sad saga was about police misconduct in a high profile RCMP murder investigation where unprofessional conduct wasn't the exception it was the norm. These clowns were getting drunk with witnesses, flirting with them and having sex with them. It wasn't just one cop and one witness. It was a climate of unprofessionalism that permeated the entire force let alone unit.
They are the ones that changed the name if IHIT to IHITit.
These are the clowns shagging Morgan Nicholson and providing police protection for Michael Ross and the rest of the Cub Pack to sell drugs in Surrey. It's time for them to be erased.
Canada - GO/DW.
Where do you get your information from ? Where is the proof of some of these comments you make ? For someone ,who is no-one in the scheme of things , your comments and accusations give an indication of familiarity or personal knowing of individuals you speak of…. Who are you Dennis Watson ? Where do you gather your info from ? What makes it credible ? I understand your another blog or public knowledge site cause everyone is entitled to know if they’d like to , I can appreciate that aspect . I’m curious as to how you obtain some of the information your convinced is true ? although I can guarantee ,your wrong about some of the allegations you’ve made for years . Also , why do you speak as if you have a personal history and or an acquaintance based relationship with many of the subjects you speak of ?
ReplyDelete